Side by side

BugLens vs Distik

Both stand on ai code review tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

BugLens

Free plan Web

Choose BugLens if you want automatic GitHub reviews with security analysis and fix suggestions, starting with a free plan for one repository. Starter is the option to consider for private repositories and context-aware reviews; teams seeking organization-wide features must wait for the Team plan.

Visit BugLens

Distik

Free trial Self-hostedWeb

Distik organizes AI-generated pull-request review around risk, intent and reviewer actions. It offers clear queue and heatmap views, but teams needing self-hosting or listed certifications must account for its current limits.

Visit Distik

The facts

	BugLens	Distik
Free plan	Yes	A free trial
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Web	Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid plan	Starter: $19 a month	Pro Annual: $240 per editor a year
Plans published	3	3
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	buglens.app	distik.dev
On ai code review tools	#30 of 47	#34 of 47

BugLens: what it does well

Automatic reviews run on GitHub.
Security analysis and custom review rules are available.
Fix suggestions are included.
Free plan covers one repository and 50 monthly AI reviews.
Starter includes private repositories and priority analysis.

What to know first

Free use is limited to one repository and 50 AI reviews monthly.
Private repository support is on the $19 per month Starter plan.
Team is waitlist-only and marked “Soon”.

Distik: what it does well

Risk-ranked pull-request queue
Inline confidence reasons and checklist
Streaming chapters for large pull requests
Per-user GitHub review actions
No training on customer code

What to know first

No free plan
Self-hosting is not currently available
Raw diffs kept 48 hours by default
Not currently HIPAA, FedRAMP or PCI-DSS certified

Alternatives to BugLens Alternatives to Distik The whole list