Side by side
Buffalo vs Symfony MakerBundle
Both stand on web frameworks. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWeb+1
Choose Buffalo if you want a free, open-source Go framework that includes hybrid rendering and an ORM. Look elsewhere if your project needs a deployment target other than self-hosted or a different primary language.
Visit Buffalo Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+2
MakerBundle provides a focused set of code-generation commands for Symfony projects, with a path to custom makers when defaults do not fit. Keep the Doctrine requirement and generated-code limitation in mind.
Visit Symfony MakerBundleThe facts
| Buffalo | Symfony MakerBundle | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Web, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | gobuffalo.io | symfony.com |
| On web frameworks | #6 of 31 | #2 of 31 |
Buffalo: what it does well
- Open-source framework with a free plan.
- Uses Go as its primary language.
- Combines hybrid rendering with an included ORM.
- Supports Linux, macOS, Windows, and web.
- Targets self-hosted deployment.
What to know first
- Deployment is listed as self-hosted.
- Go is the only listed primary language.
Symfony MakerBundle: what it does well
- Generates commands, controllers, form classes, and tests.
- Requires no configuration by default.
- Applies PHP coding standards with php-cs-fixer.
- MIT-licensed and installed as a Composer development dependency.
What to know first
- The `make:entity` command requires configured Doctrine ORM.
- Supports ORM, not ODM.
- Generated code generally cannot be modified.
Alternatives to Buffalo Alternatives to Symfony MakerBundle The whole list