Side by side

Browserling vs Browsersync

Both stand on browser testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Browserling

Free plan AndroidAPIExtension+5

Browserling combines cross-browser website checks with mobile, responsive, and private-site testing. The free option provides a way to open a URL remotely, while paid plans add capabilities such as SSH tunnels, team management, and enterprise access controls.

Visit Browserling

Browsersync

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Browsersync brings live updates and synchronized interactions to multi-browser testing, with server options for static and dynamic sites. Its Node.js requirement and role alongside, rather than instead of, watch tasks are worth noting.

Visit Browsersync

The facts

	Browserling	Browsersync
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Android, API, Extension, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows	Linux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid plan	Starter: $9 a month	Free or on request
Plans published	9	1
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	browserling.com	browsersync.io
On browser testing software	#4 of 34	#8 of 34

Browserling: what it does well

Tests across six listed browser families.
Supports Android and iOS mobile testing.
SSH tunnels reach private and local sites.
Sessions run in isolated virtual machines.
Free sandbox and free plan available.

What to know first

Starter is limited to Windows 10, Chrome, and Edge.
Live API starts at $99 a month.
Enterprise pricing is custom and not listed.

Browsersync: what it does well

Mirrors scroll, click, refresh, and form actions.
Updates connected browsers when project files change.
Can proxy an existing local server.
Available for Linux, macOS, and Windows.
Free and open source under Apache 2.0.

What to know first

Requires Node.js and npm installation.
Does not replace regular watch tasks.

Alternatives to Browserling Alternatives to Browsersync The whole list