Side by side
Broccoli vs Rake
Both stand on build automation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Broccoli provides a code-based browser asset pipeline with rebuilds, plugins, CLI commands, and a programmatic API. Its guidance separates development serving from production asset delivery.
Visit Broccoli Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Choose Rake if you want a free, Ruby-based way to define tasks, prerequisites, and file handling, with packaged tasks and parallel execution. It suits Ruby environments on Linux, macOS, and Windows; it requires Ruby 2.0.0 or later.
Visit RakeThe facts
| Broccoli | Rake | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | ruby.github.io |
| On build automation software | #20 of 42 | #24 of 42 |
Broccoli: what it does well
- Free and open source
- MIT license
- Constant-time rebuild support
- JavaScript and TypeScript build files
- Programmatic Builder API
What to know first
- Node runtime required
- Production serving needs precompilation
- General support uses GitHub issues
- Plugin questions go to plugin repositories
Rake: what it does well
- Rakefiles use standard Ruby syntax.
- Tasks can declare prerequisite tasks.
- Rule patterns can synthesize implicit tasks.
- FileLists support manipulating names and paths.
- Includes tarball tasks and parallel execution.
What to know first
- Requires Ruby 2.0.0 or later.
- Installation requires the `gem install rake` command.
- The project provides the software without express or implied warranties.
Alternatives to Broccoli Alternatives to Rake The whole list