Side by side
Brisk vs Buildkite
Both stand on continuous integration software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWeb
Brisk focuses on concurrent test execution with reusable workers and local terminal support. Compare concurrency, build-time allowances, and overage terms across its plans.
Visit Brisk
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+4
Buildkite combines pipeline execution with test-result management and a choice of agent hosting. Its free and Pro plans have stated user and concurrency limits.
Visit BuildkiteThe facts
| Brisk | Buildkite | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Web | API, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Team: $15 a month | Pro Plan: $30 per user a month |
| Plans published | 3 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | brisktest.com | buildkite.com |
| On continuous integration software | #13 of 58 | #9 of 58 |
Brisk: what it does well
- Free Developer plan available
- Keeps pre-built workers between test runs
- Supports major CI integrations
- Offers terminal-based local testing
- Enterprise includes SSO and on-premises options
What to know first
- CLI downloads list macOS and Linux only
- Team and Enterprise overage costs $0.50/hr
- Enterprise costs $2,000 a month
- Free tier includes 5X concurrency
Buildkite: what it does well
- Dynamic pipelines adapt at build time
- Test Engine can quarantine flaky tests
- Supports hosted and self-hosted agents
- Free Plan includes up to 10 concurrent jobs
- Lists integrations across monitoring and developer tools
What to know first
- Free Plan supports up to 5 users
- Free Plan includes community support
- Pro costs $30 a month per active user
Alternatives to Brisk Alternatives to Buildkite The whole list