Side by side

BitComet vs Firelink

Both stand on download manager software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

BitComet

Free plan AndroidAPIExtension+5

BitComet combines several download protocols with task controls, video preview, and remote access. Its free license is for private, personal, non-commercial use.

Visit BitComet

Firelink

Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+1

Firelink brings direct downloads, media, torrents, browser handoffs, and scheduling into one free desktop app. Check its platform packaging caveats and media limitations before choosing it.

Visit Firelink

The facts

	BitComet	Firelink
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Open source	No	Not published
Runs on	Android, API, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows	Extension, Linux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid plan	Free or on request	Free or on request
Plans published	2	2
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	bitcomet.com	github.com
On download manager software	#8 of 58	#12 of 58

BitComet: what it does well

Supports Magnet Links, HTTP Seeding, and DHT.
Can preview video while it downloads.
Offers global and per-task speed limits.
Mobile app can connect through NAT or a firewall.

What to know first

Free license is limited to non-commercial personal use.
Windows ICF and ICS configuration is a listed network feature.
Docker images are listed for GUI and WebUI.

Firelink: what it does well

Free desktop app supports Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Queues support pause, resume, retries, redownload, and scheduling.
Handles HTTP, HTTPS, media playlists, and torrents.
Companion handoff data stays local, according to the extension.

What to know first

DRM and other protected-key workflows are unsupported.
Subtitle and multiple-audio-track selection are not exposed.
macOS package is not notarized; Windows installer is unsigned.
Linux AppImage requires glibc 2.35 or newer.

Alternatives to BitComet Alternatives to Firelink The whole list