Side by side
Bearer vs gosec
Both stand on static application security testing sast. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMac
Choose Bearer CLI if you need a free source-code scanner that combines security checks with data-flow and privacy reporting. Consider its supported platforms and stated risk of missed true positives when deciding whether it fits your scanning needs.
Visit Bearer Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+1
gosec offers configurable static security analysis for Go, with several output formats and CI integration options. Teams should review findings because automated detection can flag safe code.
Visit gosecThe facts
| Bearer | gosec | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | bearer.com | github.com |
| On static application security testing sast | #5 of 24 | #1 of 24 |
Bearer: what it does well
- Free plan for open SAST.
- Classifies more than 120 sensitive data types.
- Separate scanning for hard-coded secrets.
- Documented CI/CD setup for three platforms.
- Supports pull request scans and custom rules.
What to know first
- Listed platforms are Linux and macOS.
- Classification patterns may miss some true positives.
- Requires Git 2.34 or later; macOS requires version 12 or later.
gosec: what it does well
- Checks map findings to CWE entries
- Supports rule selection and path-based exclusions
- Reports include SARIF, JSON, and JUnit XML
- Documented GitHub Actions and GitHub code scanning use
- Apache License 2.0
What to know first
- Local installation requires Go 1.25 or newer
- Automated detection can produce false positives
- AI fix suggestions call an AI API