Batfish vs ONAP
| Batfish | ONAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Deployment | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Network testing | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | A10 Networks; Arista; AWS; Azure; Cisco NX-OS, IOS, IOS-XE, IOS-XR and ASA; Check Point; Cumulus; F5 BIG-IP; Fortinet; FRR; iptables; Juniper; Nokia SR OS/SR-SIM/MD-CLI; Palo Alto Networks; SONiC; limited Aruba, Dell Force10 and Foundry support | physical network functions; virtual network functions; cloud-native network functions |
| Configuration management | — | Yes |
| Workflow orchestration | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Network Automation Software. On Freedom251, ONAP scores higher on our published basis.