Side by side
Batfish vs Firewall Policy Analyzer
Both stand on network security policy management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxMac+2
Choose Batfish if you need configuration-based checks for policy, security, change impact, or network resilience. Teams working with Aruba, Dell Force10, or Foundry should account for the project's limited support for those platforms.
Visit Batfish Free plan LinuxWebWindows
Visit Firewall Policy Analyzer The facts
| Batfish | Firewall Policy Analyzer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows | Linux, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | batfish.org | github.com |
| On network security policy management software | #1 of 37 | #3 of 37 |
Batfish: what it does well
- Analyzes configurations without direct access to network devices.
- Validates planned changes before deployment.
- Checks security policy and expected traffic paths.
- Assesses reachability after a single-link or device failure.
- Includes a Python SDK and example Jupyter notebooks.
What to know first
- Core analysis requires network device configurations.
- Support is limited for Aruba, Dell Force10, and Foundry.
Firewall Policy Analyzer: what it does well
Alternatives to Batfish Alternatives to Firewall Policy Analyzer The whole list