Side by side
Basix vs OpenTerrace
Both stand on physics simulation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMac
Basix provides finite element definitions and operations as part of the FEniCSx ecosystem. Its C++ core and Python interface support a wide range of cell types and element workflows.
Visit Basix Free plan LinuxWindows
OpenTerrace provides configurable packed-bed thermal storage simulations with documented numerical schemes and materials. Its incomplete validation documentation is a key consideration for users assessing the framework.
Visit OpenTerraceThe facts
| Basix | OpenTerrace | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac | Linux, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 1 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | fenicsproject.org | openterrace.github.io |
| On physics simulation software | #51 of 89 | #55 of 89 |
Basix: what it does well
- Free library under the MIT license.
- Core is written in C++ with Python functionality.
- Supports built-in and custom elements.
- Covers seven listed reference-cell types.
- Supports interpolation and degree-of-freedom transformations.
What to know first
- Project recommends new users use FEniCSx.
- Listed platforms are Linux and macOS.
OpenTerrace: what it does well
- Free open-source Python framework
- Finite volume thermal simulation
- Configurable shapes, substances, and boundaries
- Uses Numba, NumPy, and SciPy
- Supports extension modules
What to know first
- No 3D visuals
- Validation studies content is still being added
- Editable setup recommends Linux or WSL
- Pure advection verification results are still to be added
Alternatives to Basix Alternatives to OpenTerrace The whole list