Side by side
Bandit Stealth vs Pier
Both stand on ai coding assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+2
Bandit Stealth combines agent-driven coding tasks with configurable review controls and local or hosted inference. Its free local option and broad integration set may appeal to builders who use supported IDEs.
Visit Bandit Stealth Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Pier combines terminal coding workflows with planning, review controls, and several model options. Its free account and local execution are useful, while users should understand thread syncing and prompt-routing details.
Visit PierThe facts
| Bandit Stealth | Pier | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Pro: $5 a month |
| Plans published | 4 | 5 |
| Maker | Bandit Stealth | Not published |
| Website | burtson.ai | piercode.com |
| On ai coding assistants | #47 of 102 | #51 of 102 |
Bandit Stealth: what it does well
- Free Local plan with Ollama
- Indexes codebases and runs terminal commands
- Supports VS Code and Cursor
- Unified-diff approval for file writes
- Telemetry off by default
What to know first
- Hosted gateway requires a Bandit API key
- Some helpers require Python 3 on PATH
Pier: what it does well
- Repository reading and codebase indexing
- Read-only planning before execution
- Review gates for file changes
- Windows, macOS, and Linux support
- Free account with personal API keys
What to know first
- Subscription prompts pass through Pier servers
- Threads sync by default
- Model usage is billed at API cost on Pro
Alternatives to Bandit Stealth Alternatives to Pier The whole list