Side by side
Bamboo vs Taskcluster
Both stand on continuous integration software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid LinuxMacWeb+1
Bamboo offers plan choices with different job and agent allowances, plus self-hosted runners and pull request checks. The lack of hosted operation and on-request pricing are important considerations.
Visit Bamboo Paid APILinuxMac+3
Taskcluster provides a flexible foundation for complex CI and release automation, with broad worker options and developer interfaces. Its self-hosted model fits organizations prepared to operate the infrastructure themselves.
Visit TaskclusterThe facts
| Bamboo | Taskcluster | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Web, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | atlassian.com | taskcluster.net |
| On continuous integration software | #52 of 58 | #56 of 58 |
Bamboo: what it does well
- Growing teams includes unlimited jobs and local agents.
- Data Center includes unlimited jobs.
- Supports pull request checks.
- Artifact or dependency caching is available.
What to know first
- There is no free plan.
- Prices are available on request.
- Hosted operation is not offered.
- Small teams has no remote agents.
Taskcluster: what it does well
- Open-source and free
- Dependency graphs for task ordering
- Scheduled jobs and custom retry policies
- GitHub checks integration
- Interactive worker debugging
What to know first
- Self-hosted deployment required
- Scale and setup may require infrastructure management
- API access uses granular scopes
Alternatives to Bamboo Alternatives to Taskcluster The whole list