FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Axosoft vs Phorge

Both stand on bug tracking software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Axosoft

Free trial APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

Axosoft combines agile planning with support and documentation features, plus installed and hosted deployment choices. Review infrastructure requirements and the installed renewal cost before selecting an edition.

Visit Axosoft

Phorge

Free plan APILinuxMac+2

Phorge brings project organization and development tools together while letting teams host the software and retain their data. Teams need to meet its server requirements, and Windows-focused toolsets may integrate less well.

Visit Phorge

The facts

AxosoftPhorge
Free planA free trialYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, WebAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planAxosoft Installed: $250 per user, paid onceFree or on request
Plans published21
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteaxosoft.comphorge.it
On bug tracking software#14 of 26#10 of 26

Axosoft: what it does well

  • Scrum and Kanban planning tools
  • Configurable workflows and permissions
  • Built-in help desk and wiki
  • RESTful integration API
  • Hourly and daily database backups

What to know first

  • No free plan
  • Installed edition requires Windows Server stack
  • Installed license renewals cost 35%

Phorge: what it does well

  • Includes code review, repository browsing, bug tracking, and wiki tools
  • Supports Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repository hosting
  • Herald rules can trigger webhooks
  • Arcanist supports review, linting, and unit-test workflows

What to know first

  • Requires a non-Windows server operating system
  • Shared hosting is unsupported
  • Windows-focused development setups may have limited tool integration

Alternatives to Axosoft Alternatives to Phorge The whole list