Side by side
axesCheck vs Guidepup
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan AndroidiPhoneLinux+3
axesCheck provides free automated checks for machine-verifiable PDF accessibility requirements across common browsers and devices. It is best used alongside human review because several accessibility qualities are outside its automated scope.
Visit axesCheck
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Guidepup gives JavaScript tests direct control over real and virtual screen-reader workflows. Teams should combine its virtual coverage with real-reader and user testing, following the setup and concurrency requirements.
Visit GuidepupThe facts
| axesCheck | Guidepup | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | axesCheck | Not published |
| Website | check.axes4.com | guidepup.dev |
| On accessibility testing software | #52 of 169 | #48 of 169 |
axesCheck: what it does well
- Free plan with 0.00 USD pricing
- Checks PDF/UA and WCAG A and AA requirements
- Works on computers and smartphones
- Accepts uploads up to 10 MB
- Automated checks cover structure and metadata
What to know first
- No manual review tools
- No remediation guidance
- Uploaded documents may be temporarily stored
- Human checks remain necessary
Guidepup: what it does well
- Automates VoiceOver and NVDA
- Virtual reader needs no machine setup
- Captures spoken phrases for assertions
- Integrates with several test frameworks
- Runs in continuous integration
What to know first
- Real-reader runs require machine and asset setup
- Shared screen readers should not run concurrently
- Virtual reader does not replace real-reader testing
- No mobile testing support
Alternatives to axesCheck Alternatives to Guidepup The whole list