Side by side
axe Auditor vs CAAT
Both stand on website accessibility tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid AndroidiPhoneMac+2
axe Auditor brings guided manual testing together with automation, remediation guidance, and conformance documentation. Its broad testing coverage and Jira workflow are useful for teams that can work with request-based pricing and administrator setup.
Visit axe Auditor
Free trial Web
CAAT brings automated scanning, manual audits, standards catalogs, and reporting into one browser-based workspace. Its usage credits, per-analysis scope, and paid-only model should be considered before choosing a plan.
Visit CAATThe facts
| axe Auditor | CAAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, iPhone, Mac, Web, Windows | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | See the plans |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | axe Auditor | Not published |
| Website | deque.com | caat.report |
| On website accessibility tools | #106 of 133 | #111 of 133 |
axe Auditor: what it does well
- Covers WCAG 2.2
- Combines automated and manual testing
- Tests mobile apps and multiple document types
- Creates and publishes ACR/VPATs
- Two-way Jira integration for listed customers
What to know first
- Pricing requires a request
- Jira needs administrator configuration
- Paid product
CAAT: what it does well
- WCAG 2.2 coverage with mobile testing
- Manual audits include custom checklists and accessible reports
- PDF/UA checks use PAC technology powered by axesPAC
- CSV export and JSON import support workflows
- 15-day trial available
What to know first
- No free plan
- Each automatic analysis covers one URL or PDF page
- Monthly analysis credits limit total usage
- Solo costs €500 a year excluding VAT
Alternatives to axe Auditor Alternatives to CAAT The whole list