Side by side
Avigilon Unity Access vs Gallagher Command Centre
Both stand on access control system. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid AndroidiPhoneWeb
Visit Avigilon Unity Access 
Paid AndroidAPIiPhone+3
Choose Gallagher Command Centre if you need a centralized system for access, site security, and related building operations. Its standard inclusions cover 16 doors, a workstation, mobile credentials, and six fence zones. Consider another option if you need published pricing or server and workstation support outside the listed Windows editions.
Visit Gallagher Command CentreThe facts
| Avigilon Unity Access | Gallagher Command Centre | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, iPhone, Web | Android, API, iPhone, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | avigilon.com | security.gallagher.com |
| On access control system | #11 of 16 | #7 of 16 |
Avigilon Unity Access: what it does well
Gallagher Command Centre: what it does well
- Combines access, visitor, contractor, and emergency response functions.
- Includes 16 doors and six fence zones as standard.
- Supports real-time alarm management, reporting, and perimeter security.
- Optional integrations cover video, biometrics, elevators, and sensors.
- Lists 256-bit AES encryption for data protection.
What to know first
- Pricing is available on request.
- Server and workstation requirements are limited to specified Windows editions.
- Computer sizing depends on site variables and requires discussion with Technical Support.
Alternatives to Avigilon Unity Access Alternatives to Gallagher Command Centre The whole list