Side by side
Automatic API Attack Tool vs Pynt
Both stand on api security testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxWindows
Automatic API Attack Tool offers specification-driven fuzzing with configurable request generation and reporting. Its required Swagger 2.0 format and Java and Gradle requirements are key setup constraints.
Visit Automatic API Attack Tool
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Pynt offers API security testing with contextual attack simulation and workflow integrations. The free Starter plan has a 10-endpoint limit, while Business cloud scans are available under a free trial.
Visit PyntThe facts
| Automatic API Attack Tool | Pynt | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Windows | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | pynt.io |
| On api security testing software | #8 of 27 | #12 of 27 |
Automatic API Attack Tool: what it does well
- Free, open-source, and MIT-licensed
- Tests valid and invalid generated parameter values
- Supports authorization and input-validation testing
- Offers proxy routing and Jenkins workflow guidance
- Runs on Linux and Windows
What to know first
- Requires Swagger 2.0 in JSON or YAML
- Requires Java 8 or higher and Gradle
- Does not discover APIs
Pynt: what it does well
- Uses API context to shape security testing
- Findings include evidence, fix suggestions and risk scores
- CLI supports CI/CD automation with JSON results
- Starter plan is free for up to 10 API endpoints
- Supports multiple traffic sources and integrations
What to know first
- Starter testing is limited to 10 endpoints
- Local use requires Docker and Python 3.9 or later
- Postman integration requires the desktop app
Alternatives to Automatic API Attack Tool Alternatives to Pynt The whole list