Side by side
Autodesk Flame vs Chromatica
Both stand on video color grading software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid LinuxMac
Choose Autodesk Flame if your finishing or visual-effects work needs its listed tracking, compositing, keying, and rotoscoping capabilities. Look elsewhere if you need a free plan or support beyond macOS and Rocky Linux.
Visit Autodesk Flame
Paid Mac
Chromatica offers color transforms, look development, and output mapping through plugins for supported hosts. The Film version adds grain, halation, and bloom, with both options sold as one-time purchases.
Visit ChromaticaThe facts
| Autodesk Flame | Chromatica | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac | Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Chromatica: €99, paid once |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | autodesk.com | chromatica.store |
| On video color grading software | #19 of 25 | #15 of 25 |
Autodesk Flame: what it does well
- Includes 3D camera tracking.
- Supports node-based compositing.
- Provides keying and rotoscoping tools.
- Uses a GPU render engine.
- A 30-day trial is available.
What to know first
- There is no free plan.
- Supported platforms are macOS and Rocky Linux.
Chromatica: what it does well
- Supports four listed video hosts
- One-time license has no expiry date
- Covers commercial and client work without royalties
- Footage is processed on the user's machine
- License covers two machines
What to know first
- Requires Apple silicon
- Requires macOS 13 or newer
- Windows is coming soon
- Prices exclude VAT
Alternatives to Autodesk Flame Alternatives to Chromatica The whole list