Side by side
AudioEye vs CAAT
Both stand on website accessibility tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Web
AudioEye brings automated and human-oriented accessibility work into one web service, with options ranging from self-managed tools to managed monitoring and fixes. Compare each plan's listed support, training, and reporting elements before requesting a price.
Visit AudioEye
Free trial Web
CAAT brings automated scanning, manual audits, standards catalogs, and reporting into one browser-based workspace. Its usage credits, per-analysis scope, and paid-only model should be considered before choosing a plan.
Visit CAATThe facts
| AudioEye | CAAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | See the plans |
| Plans published | 3 | 3 |
| Maker | AudioEye | Not published |
| Website | audioeye.com | caat.report |
| On website accessibility tools | #115 of 133 | #111 of 133 |
AudioEye: what it does well
- Covers WCAG 2.2
- Automated scans and manual review tools
- Mobile testing and CI/CD integration
- Remediation guidance included
- 14-day trial available
What to know first
- No free plan
- Pricing is available on request
- Plans differ in included tools and services
CAAT: what it does well
- WCAG 2.2 coverage with mobile testing
- Manual audits include custom checklists and accessible reports
- PDF/UA checks use PAC technology powered by axesPAC
- CSV export and JSON import support workflows
- 15-day trial available
What to know first
- No free plan
- Each automatic analysis covers one URL or PDF page
- Monthly analysis credits limit total usage
- Solo costs €500 a year excluding VAT
Alternatives to AudioEye Alternatives to CAAT The whole list