FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

async-graphql vs Strawberry GraphQL

Both stand on graphql tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

async-graphql

Free plan Self-hosted

async-graphql offers broad GraphQL capabilities in a Rust server library, with multiple integrations and Apollo support. Developers should account for its Rust version requirement and configure query limits for production.

Visit async-graphql

Strawberry GraphQL

Free plan APISelf-hosted

Strawberry GraphQL offers Python developers a self-hosted way to build GraphQL APIs with type hints, async support, extensions, and federation. Its framework integration list carries a currency warning, so check the relevant integration details before relying on them.

Visit Strawberry GraphQL

The facts

async-graphqlStrawberry GraphQL
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onSelf-hostedAPI, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planNot publishedFree or on request
Plans publishedNone1
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comstrawberry.rocks
On graphql tools#16 of 32#20 of 32

async-graphql: what it does well

  • Supports static and dynamic schemas
  • Includes five web-server integrations
  • Supports WebSocket subscriptions and multipart uploads
  • Forbids unsafe code

What to know first

  • Requires Rust 1.86.0 or later
  • Most crate features are disabled by default
  • Production query complexity and depth need limits

Strawberry GraphQL: what it does well

  • Free plan; open-source and MIT licensed
  • Python type hints define GraphQL schemas
  • Built-in dataloader batches multiple queries
  • Supports async resolvers and federated schemas
  • Lists integrations across several Python frameworks

What to know first

  • Requires Python 3.10 or later
  • Integration table may not be up to date
  • Maintained by a small developer team

Alternatives to async-graphql Alternatives to Strawberry GraphQL The whole list