Side by side
AshVid vs Plux
Both stand on video downloaders. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial ExtensionLinuxMac+1
AshVid offers local handling, multiple source types, and quality options up to 4K for authorized downloads. Check the browser permission scope and compatibility caveat, and confirm the subscription terms that fit your intended access period.
Visit AshVid Free plan LinuxMac
Plux provides core multiplexer features with SSH attachment and optional clipboard support. Its Unix-only scope and lack of crash recovery or terminal graphics support are important constraints.
Visit PluxThe facts
| AshVid | Plux | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Extension, Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | 6 months Subscription: $9.63, paid once | Not published |
| Plans published | 4 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | ashvid.org | github.com |
| On video downloaders | #115 of 135 | #111 of 135 |
AshVid: what it does well
- Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
- Processes selected files locally and saves to a chosen folder.
- Supports quality choices up to 4K Ultra HD.
- Queues multiple authorized links for batch downloads.
What to know first
- Internet access is needed to retrieve new source files.
- The Chrome companion may request broad site access.
- Continued compatibility with specific sources is not guaranteed.
- The service has no free plan.
Plux: what it does well
- Named sessions detach and reattach
- Vertical and horizontal pane splits
- SSH remote attachment
- Searchable scrollback and history
- MIT-licensed free software
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Shells are not restored after crashes or reboot
- Terminal graphics protocols are unsupported
- Remote clipboard uploads default to 64 MiB