FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

asdf vs nvm

Both stand on runtime version managers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

asdf

Free plan LinuxMac

asdf offers a shared way to select development tool versions, with plugins and several installation routes. Teams should account for its narrow scope and explicitly configure versions or use `system` where appropriate.

Visit asdf

nvm

Free plan Open source LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1

nvm provides per-user Node.js version management with project pinning and offline installation options. Check shell compatibility, particularly if using Fish or a Windows environment outside WSL.

Visit nvm

The facts

asdfnvm
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedYes
Runs onLinux, MacLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteasdf-vm.comgithub.com
On runtime version managers#3 of 30#1 of 30

asdf: what it does well

  • Free and open source
  • One `.tool-versions` file covers multiple tools
  • Supports Bash, ZSH, Fish and Elvish
  • Can use existing version files per plugin
  • Provides a GitHub Action for CI/CD

What to know first

  • Does not manage system packages
  • Does not manage upstream dependencies
  • Unset tool versions error unless set to `system`

nvm: what it does well

  • Free and MIT licensed
  • Supports Node.js LTS versions
  • Project versions can be specified in .nvmrc
  • Can install cached versions offline
  • Documented Docker and CI/CD use

What to know first

  • Fish shell is not supported
  • Windows support depends on the environment
  • Only the latest nvm version is supported

Alternatives to asdf Alternatives to nvm The whole list