FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Arroxy vs ReClip

Both stand on video downloaders. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Arroxy

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Choose Arroxy if you want a free graphical route to yt-dlp’s downloading options, including playlist selection, subtitles, and batch jobs. Look elsewhere if you need DRM removal or a stream that yt-dlp cannot access.

Visit Arroxy

ReClip

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1

ReClip offers broad source coverage, batch downloads, format selection, and local processing without an account. Its personal-use restriction and installation requirements should guide deployment decisions.

Visit ReClip

The facts

ArroxyReClip
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, WindowsLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitearroxy.orionus.devreclip.store
On video downloaders#24 of 135#28 of 135

Arroxy: what it does well

  • Free plan with MIT-licensed public source.
  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
  • Supports more than 2,000 sites through yt-dlp.
  • Queues whole playlists or selected entries.
  • Saves or embeds subtitles and metadata.

What to know first

  • Does not remove DRM or access streams yt-dlp cannot reach.
  • Linux install script supports x86_64 only.
  • Windows builds lack a paid certificate; macOS builds are not Apple-notarized.

ReClip: what it does well

  • Supports more than 1,000 sites
  • Downloads video up to 4K
  • Batch URLs and removes duplicates
  • Runs without accounts or cloud processing
  • Open source under the MIT license

What to know first

  • Personal use only
  • Non-Docker setup needs Python, yt-dlp, and ffmpeg
  • Requires respecting platform terms and copyright

Alternatives to Arroxy Alternatives to ReClip The whole list