Side by side
AppTrack vs Buildkite
Both stand on mobile ci/cd software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
AppTrack combines build, signing and release controls for mobile apps, with self-hosting and iOS runner support. Check the PolyForm Noncommercial License terms before using it commercially.
Visit AppTrack
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+4
Buildkite combines pipeline execution with test-result management and a choice of agent hosting. Its free and Pro plans have stated user and concurrency limits.
Visit BuildkiteThe facts
| AppTrack | Buildkite | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web | API, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Pro Plan: $30 per user a month |
| Plans published | None | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | buildkite.com |
| On mobile ci/cd software | #10 of 22 | #6 of 22 |
AppTrack: what it does well
- Supports a broad set of mobile frameworks
- iOS builds use hosted macOS runners
- Signing Doctor can repair signing issues
- Supports staged rollouts and rollback
- Data and credentials stay on user-controlled servers
What to know first
- Commercial use requires a separate license
- Self-hosted deployment requires user-controlled infrastructure
Buildkite: what it does well
- Dynamic pipelines adapt at build time
- Test Engine can quarantine flaky tests
- Supports hosted and self-hosted agents
- Free Plan includes up to 10 concurrent jobs
- Lists integrations across monitoring and developer tools
What to know first
- Free Plan supports up to 5 users
- Free Plan includes community support
- Pro costs $30 a month per active user
Alternatives to AppTrack Alternatives to Buildkite The whole list