Side by side
Apono vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)
Both stand on cloud infrastructure entitlement management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Web
Visit Apono Paid WebAPI
Choose Check Point WAF if you need hybrid web or API protection with bot management and rate limiting. Advanced offers defined tenant allowances, while Premium raises the stated admin and asset caps and extends log retention; teams seeking a free plan should look elsewhere.
Visit Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)The facts
| Apono | Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web, API |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. |
| Website | apono.io | checkpoint.com |
| On cloud infrastructure entitlement management software | #18 of 25 | #14 of 25 |
Apono: what it does well
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF): what it does well
- Protects web and API assets.
- Includes bot management and rate limiting.
- Pay-as-you-go plans include a free period or request allowance.
- Premium has unlimited protected assets and management admins.
- Premium includes six months of log retention.
What to know first
- There is no free plan.
- Advanced is limited to 100 protected assets and 40 management admins per tenant.
- Pay-as-you-go plans include 10 root domains.
Alternatives to Apono Alternatives to Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) The whole list