Side by side

Apache Camel vs Mule ESB

Both stand on integration platform as a service software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Apache Camel

Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+2

Apache Camel combines broad connector and route options with integration and security capabilities. Check the Java requirements and LTS support window for the release you plan to use.

Visit Apache Camel

Anypoint Platform brings API development, integrations and automation into one offering with multiple deployment options. Review package credit allocations and usage requirements, since they vary by selection and consumption.

Visit Mule ESB

The facts

	Apache Camel	Mule ESB
Free plan	Yes	A free trial
Open source	Yes	Not published
Runs on	API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows	API, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid plan	Free or on request	MuleSoft packages: $2 a month
Plans published	2	4
Maker	Not published	Mule ESB
Website	camel.apache.org	mulesoft.com
On integration platform as a service software	#2 of 113	#48 of 113

Apache Camel: what it does well

Free under the Apache License 2.0.
Provides 350+ connectors and 65+ integration patterns.
Routes can use Java, YAML, or XML.
Production mode blocks insecure configuration by default.

What to know first

The current LTS release requires Java 17, 21, or 25.
Insecure production configuration can be allowed by override.
Long Term Support fixes last up to one year.

Mule ESB: what it does well

Hundreds of prebuilt connectors are listed.
API Designer supports visual and code-based work.
Supports on-premises, cloud and hybrid deployment.
30-day trial includes the full portfolio.
Security details include encryption and audit logs.

What to know first

No free plan is listed.
Starting package costs $2,000 a month, billed annually.
Credit use varies by usage type.
Exact features and credit allocation depend on package.

Alternatives to Apache Camel Alternatives to Mule ESB The whole list