Side by side
AntidoteDB vs Badger
Both stand on key-value databases. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted
AntidoteDB combines geo-replication, high availability, and CRDT data types in a self-hosted database. Review its transaction constraint and preferred client interface before adopting it.
Visit AntidoteDB Paid LinuxMacWindows
Visit Badger The facts
| AntidoteDB | Badger | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | antidotedb.eu | github.com |
| On key-value databases | #25 of 31 | #29 of 31 |
AntidoteDB: what it does well
- Free and open-source
- CRDTs support concurrent updates
- Multi-region and clustering support
- Disk persistence
- Clients for several languages
What to know first
- Static transactions cannot read and update together
- Protocol Buffer interface is restricted
- Self-hosted deployment required
Badger: what it does well
Alternatives to AntidoteDB Alternatives to Badger The whole list
