FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Ambient CI vs SourceHut Builds

Both stand on continuous integration software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Ambient CI

Paid LinuxSelf-hosted

Ambient CI focuses on self-hosted builds with strict VM isolation and controlled network access. Its alpha status and command-line setup matter for teams seeking a settled hosted service.

Visit Ambient CI

SourceHut Builds

Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

SourceHut Builds combines manifest-driven CI with repository triggers, mailing-list integration, APIs, and optional self-hosting. Its paid public-alpha plans all include full access to services.

Visit SourceHut Builds

The facts

Ambient CISourceHut Builds
Free planNot publishedNo
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Self-hostedAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planNot publishedAmateur hackers: $4 a month
Plans publishedNone3
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteambient.liw.fibuilds.sr.ht
On continuous integration software#50 of 58#54 of 58

Ambient CI: what it does well

  • Free and licensed under AGPLv3 or later
  • Build plan runs without network access
  • Fresh ephemeral VM for each phase
  • Configurable resource, cache and artifact limits
  • Supports Rust, Debian, shell and custom actions

What to know first

  • Alpha software may change inconveniently
  • No hosted option
  • Build logs may need post-processing
  • GitHub and GitLab integration is listed as a project want

SourceHut Builds: what it does well

  • Runs jobs in KVM virtual machines
  • Supports Linux, BSD, and Plan 9 images
  • Git and Mercurial submission triggers
  • GraphQL and artifact APIs
  • Open-source self-hosting option

What to know first

  • No free plan
  • Payment required during public alpha
  • Hosted plans start at $4 a month

Alternatives to Ambient CI Alternatives to SourceHut Builds The whole list