Side by side
Amazon SageMaker Lakehouse vs Onehouse Cloud
Both stand on data lakehouse platforms. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Web
Visit Amazon SageMaker Lakehouse 
Free trial APIWeb
Choose Onehouse Cloud if your team needs managed lakehouse ingestion, compute and table services in its VPC. Teams considering Open Engines should account for separate cloud resource charges and limited support, and all users should account for separate infrastructure costs.
Visit Onehouse CloudThe facts
| Amazon SageMaker Lakehouse | Onehouse Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | API, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | aws.amazon.com | onehouse.ai |
| On data lakehouse platforms | #19 of 23 | #15 of 23 |
Amazon SageMaker Lakehouse: what it does well
Onehouse Cloud: what it does well
- Ingests incrementally into Hudi, Iceberg and Delta Lake tables.
- Runs SQL, Spark jobs and PySpark notebooks with autoscaling compute.
- Supports Trino, Apache Flink and Ray on managed engine clusters.
- Syncs metadata across four named catalog integrations.
- Includes project-level role-based access controls and audit logs.
What to know first
- Cloud infrastructure costs are separate from OCU usage.
- Open Engines support is limited to infrastructure-level issues.
- Retrieving costs by API is not yet available.
Alternatives to Amazon SageMaker Lakehouse Alternatives to Onehouse Cloud The whole list