Side by side
Amazon MemoryDB vs Azure Table Storage
Both stand on key-value databases. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APIWeb
Amazon MemoryDB combines in-memory performance with durability, scaling options, and Valkey and Redis OSS compatibility. Review the per-instance-hour and data-written charges, along with the stated Multi-Region limitations, before choosing it.
Visit Amazon MemoryDB
Free trial API
Visit Azure Table Storage The facts
| Amazon MemoryDB | Azure Table Storage | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Web | API |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | aws.amazon.com | azure.microsoft.com |
| On key-value databases | #24 of 31 | #20 of 31 |
Amazon MemoryDB: what it does well
- Supports Valkey and Redis OSS data types, parameters, and commands.
- Scales reads with replicas and writes with sharding.
- Multi-Region supports active-active replication.
- Provides encryption at rest and in transit.
- Offers CloudWatch metrics and automatic software patching.
What to know first
- No free plan.
- Data written costs $0.20/GB.
- Multi-Region does not support data tiering or vector search.
- Data tiering can add latency on first access to less-used items.
Azure Table Storage: what it does well
Alternatives to Amazon MemoryDB Alternatives to Azure Table Storage The whole list