Side by side
Amaroad vs Slidemason
Both stand on ai presentation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Self-hostedWeb
Amaroad offers a code-centered way to build decks with agent assistance, reusable components, and multiple export options. It fits developers comfortable editing MDX and working through terminal-based agents rather than a conventional visual editor.
Visit Amaroad Free plan MacWebWindows
Slidemason offers local, inspectable deck generation with broad input support and configurable slide building. Its free license is useful, but installation and an AI coding tool remain necessary.
Visit SlidemasonThe facts
| Amaroad | Slidemason | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted, Web | Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | amaroad.com | github.com |
| On ai presentation software | #7 of 84 | #47 of 84 |
Amaroad: what it does well
- Free and open source under MIT License
- Supports Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and Cursor
- More than 100 built-in templates
- Exports PDF and PPTX files
- Allows parallel slide revisions
What to know first
- Web UI is view-only
- Creation requires AI coding agents
- Requires Node.js 22.13+ and pnpm 11+
Slidemason: what it does well
- Free and open source under MIT license
- Runs locally without accounts or API keys
- Accepts documents and images
- Exports PDF and PPTX
- Brand controls and 12 themes
What to know first
- Requires Node.js, pnpm and Git
- Needs an AI coding tool
- PPTX layouts may need rearrangement
- No hosted service is listed
Alternatives to Amaroad Alternatives to Slidemason The whole list