Side by side
AllyCat vs Free Website Accessibility Checker
Both stand on website accessibility tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
AllyCat brings accessibility checks into source editing and CI before deployment. Its quick scans have fewer requirements, while full contrast scans need Chromium and some runtime CSS remains outside static analysis.
Visit AllyCat Free plan Web
The free plan provides a way to check one page or URL at a time, while paid tiers increase page capacity. Choose a plan by the number of pages and websites you need to cover and its billing term.
Visit Free Website Accessibility CheckerThe facts
| AllyCat | Free Website Accessibility Checker | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Small Site: $9 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 8 |
| Maker | Not published | Free Website Accessibility Checker |
| Website | github.com | skynettechnologies.com |
| On website accessibility tools | #33 of 133 | #37 of 133 |
AllyCat: what it does well
- Free MIT-licensed CLI
- Works across Linux, macOS, and Windows
- Source-line findings with VS Code links
- CI gates and saved baselines
- JSON and self-contained HTML reports
What to know first
- Requires Node.js 20 or later
- Full scans require Chromium
- Runtime CSS-in-JS contrast cannot be statically analysed
- Full WCAG AAA needs manual auditing
Free Website Accessibility Checker: what it does well
- Free plan checks one page or URL at a time
- Checks against WCAG 2.2
- Monthly and annual plans offer different page allowances
- Annual plans include multiple websites
What to know first
- Scheduled scans are not available
- Free plan is limited to one page or URL at a time
Alternatives to AllyCat Alternatives to Free Website Accessibility Checker The whole list