FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Airtool 2 vs GL PacketScan

Both stand on network packet capture software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Airtool 2

Paid Mac
Visit Airtool 2

GL PacketScan

Paid LinuxWebWindows

Choose GL PacketScan for detailed telecom and VoIP packet, call, and voice-quality analysis across live or recorded traffic. PacketScan Web adds multi-user browser access and automation options for distributed deployments. Consider another tool if you need included protocol decodes without additional licenses or a published price.

Visit GL PacketScan

The facts

Airtool 2GL PacketScan
Free planNoNo
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onMacLinux, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedFree or on request
Plans publishedNone1
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteintuitibits.comgl.com
On network packet capture software#21 of 22#17 of 22

Airtool 2: what it does well

    GL PacketScan: what it does well

    • Analyzes live and recorded IPv4 and IPv6 traffic
    • Broad 5G, LTE, IMS, and voice protocol coverage
    • Correlates signaling and media into calls
    • Reports MOS, R-Factor, jitter, delay, and packet loss
    • REST APIs and centralized PacketScan Web access

    What to know first

    • No free plan
    • Additional protocol decodes require licenses
    • Pricing is available on request
    • Listed capacity varies by PacketScan configuration

    Alternatives to Airtool 2 Alternatives to GL PacketScan The whole list