Side by side
Airtool 2 vs GL PacketScan
Both stand on network packet capture software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Mac
Visit Airtool 2 Paid LinuxWebWindows
Choose GL PacketScan for detailed telecom and VoIP packet, call, and voice-quality analysis across live or recorded traffic. PacketScan Web adds multi-user browser access and automation options for distributed deployments. Consider another tool if you need included protocol decodes without additional licenses or a published price.
Visit GL PacketScanThe facts
| Airtool 2 | GL PacketScan | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Mac | Linux, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | intuitibits.com | gl.com |
| On network packet capture software | #21 of 22 | #17 of 22 |
Airtool 2: what it does well
GL PacketScan: what it does well
- Analyzes live and recorded IPv4 and IPv6 traffic
- Broad 5G, LTE, IMS, and voice protocol coverage
- Correlates signaling and media into calls
- Reports MOS, R-Factor, jitter, delay, and packet loss
- REST APIs and centralized PacketScan Web access
What to know first
- No free plan
- Additional protocol decodes require licenses
- Pricing is available on request
- Listed capacity varies by PacketScan configuration
Alternatives to Airtool 2 Alternatives to GL PacketScan The whole list
