Side by side
agentty vs OpenJet
Both stand on ai coding assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan AndroidLinuxMac+1
agentty combines terminal coding assistance, broad model compatibility, local Ollama use, and integrations such as Zed and MCP. Its sandbox behavior differs by platform, so users should account for those operating-system limits.
Visit agentty Free plan APILinuxMac+1
OpenJet focuses on local coding-agent workflows with chat, indexing, terminal access, and SDK support. Review hardware requirements, licensing, and the optional external routing path before adoption.
Visit OpenJetThe facts
| agentty | OpenJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, Linux, Mac, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | OpenJet Starter Pilot: £2,500, paid once |
| Plans published | None | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | agentty.org | openjet.dev |
| On ai coding assistants | #60 of 103 | #56 of 103 |
agentty: what it does well
- Free and MIT licensed
- Supports multiple hosted and local model options
- Persistent threads and durable memory
- Sandboxed shell calls on Linux and macOS
- Works with Zed and MCP tools
What to know first
- Windows shell and build calls are unsandboxed
- Android without root lacks shell sandboxing
- Runs in the terminal as a coding agent
- Air-gap mode trusts the remote host with tokens
OpenJet: what it does well
- Local model keeps code and prompts on-machine
- Codebase indexing and terminal access
- Supports Ollama and LM Studio connections
- Offline operation after assets are installed
- MCP tools and device sources
What to know first
- No code completion
- No supported IDEs listed
- Recommended hardware needs substantial memory
- Cloud routing sends content to providers
Alternatives to agentty Alternatives to OpenJet The whole list