FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Active@ Disk Image vs FSArchiver

Both stand on disk imaging software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Active@ Disk Image

Free plan Self-hostedWindows

Active@ Disk Image covers disk imaging, restoration and multiple storage destinations, with bootable recovery media included. Compare license terms and editions: some backup types and scheduling are tied to Professional listings.

Visit Active@ Disk Image

FSArchiver

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

Choose FSArchiver for free Linux filesystem archiving when file-level backups, compression and encrypted archives fit the job. Look elsewhere if you need bare-metal restore, bootable recovery media or a cloud image destination, or if you require NTFS support without its experimental status.

Visit FSArchiver

The facts

Active@ Disk ImageFSArchiver
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onSelf-hosted, WindowsLinux, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planPersonal Standard: $49, paid onceFree or on request
Plans published81
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitedisk-image.comfsarchiver.org
On disk imaging software#5 of 30#9 of 30

Active@ Disk Image: what it does well

  • Can create and restore disk images
  • Incremental and differential images are listed
  • Includes bootable recovery media
  • Supports encryption up to AES-256
  • Freeware edition is available

What to know first

  • Professional Trial expires after 21 days
  • Personal licenses cover three PCs for non-commercial use
  • Personal Standard costs $49, paid once

FSArchiver: what it does well

  • Restores archives to differently sized partitions or other filesystems.
  • Preserves standard file attributes when supported by the kernel.
  • One archive can contain multiple filesystems.
  • Offers several listed compression methods and password encryption.
  • Checksums help identify damage while allowing other files to be restored.

What to know first

  • NTFS support is experimental.
  • Btrfs snapshots and other filesystem-specific features are not preserved.
  • A read-write mounted volume can have backup problems if files change.
  • No cloud image destination, bootable recovery media, or bare-metal restore.

Alternatives to Active@ Disk Image Alternatives to FSArchiver The whole list