Side by side
Accesstive vs veraPDF
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Accesstive brings scanning, review, integration, and remediation guidance into one web service. Compare each plan’s page allowance, monitoring, support, and team limits with your website’s needs.
Visit Accesstive Free plan APILinuxMac+1
veraPDF combines conformance checking with policy evaluation, limited metadata repair, and report conversion. Desktop users should account for the Java requirement; development builds may be incomplete.
Visit veraPDFThe facts
| Accesstive | veraPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | API, Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Solo: €19 a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 4 | 1 |
| Maker | Accesstive | Not published |
| Website | accesstive.com | verapdf.org |
| On accessibility testing software | #37 of 169 | #33 of 169 |
Accesstive: what it does well
- WCAG 2.2 coverage
- Automated scans and manual reviews
- CI/CD integration
- Free plan and 14-day trial
- Multiple page and team tiers
What to know first
- Paid plans billed annually
- Solo limits coverage to fewer than 100 pages
- Growth costs €198.00 monthly billed annually
veraPDF: what it does well
- Validates all PDF/A parts and conformance levels
- Machine checks PDF/UA parts 1 and 2
- Offers GUI, command-line, and Java library access
- Downloads include GPG signatures
What to know first
- Desktop systems need Java 8 or later
- Metadata repairs are limited
- Development builds may contain bugs or unfinished features
Alternatives to Accesstive Alternatives to veraPDF The whole list

