Side by side
AccessSure vs Accesstive
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Self-hostedWeb
AccessSure combines automated WCAG scanning with detailed evidence and exportable reports. Its page limits, absent API, and need for human review are important when planning compliance work.
Visit AccessSure
Free plan Web
Accesstive brings scanning, review, integration, and remediation guidance into one web service. Compare each plan’s page allowance, monitoring, support, and team limits with your website’s needs.
Visit AccesstiveThe facts
| AccessSure | Accesstive | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Automated (annual): ₹100,000 a year | Solo: €19 a month |
| Plans published | 5 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Accesstive |
| Website | web.accesssure.in | accesstive.com |
| On accessibility testing software | #41 of 169 | #37 of 169 |
AccessSure: what it does well
- WCAG 2.2 checks with custom additions
- Evidence includes screenshots and DOM selectors
- PDF, DOCX, and JSON report exports
- Scheduled scans on paid plans
- Free Snapshot plan available
What to know first
- No current API access
- Automated coverage is only about 30–40%
- Free Snapshot covers one URL
- Cannot issue a GIGW certificate
Accesstive: what it does well
- WCAG 2.2 coverage
- Automated scans and manual reviews
- CI/CD integration
- Free plan and 14-day trial
- Multiple page and team tiers
What to know first
- Paid plans billed annually
- Solo limits coverage to fewer than 100 pages
- Growth costs €198.00 monthly billed annually
Alternatives to AccessSure Alternatives to Accesstive The whole list