Side by side
Abstrackr vs ASReview
Both stand on ai literature review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Abstrackr supports systematic review citation screening from import through conflict handling and export. It is free and has no seat or usage caps, but it does not provide AI paper summaries or full-text analysis.
Visit Abstrackr
Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+3
ASReview offers active-learning prioritization, team screening, and workflow automation for systematic reviews. Its local setup keeps data on the user's computer, while organizations can deploy it within their own environment.
Visit ASReviewThe facts
| Abstrackr | ASReview | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | Web | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | abstrackr.com | asreview.nl |
| On ai literature review software | #4 of 38 | #1 of 38 |
Abstrackr: what it does well
- Completely free, with no usage caps or seat limits
- Supports solo and blinded team screening
- Imports PubMed, Scopus, Embase, RIS, and CSV citations
- Exports CSV, RIS, and JSONL
- No installation is needed
What to know first
- No AI paper summaries
- No full-text analysis
- Machine-learning ranking begins after about 100 labels
ASReview: what it does well
- Free and open source, with no licensing fees or subscriptions
- Human screeners remain in the decision loop
- Supports parallel screening through Crowdscreen
- Imports and exports CSV, RIS, and XLSX
- Local setup keeps data on the user's computer
What to know first
- ELAS-Heavy and ELAS-L require the Dory package
- Running your own hardware or server may incur costs
- AI paper summaries are not included
- Full-text management is not included
Alternatives to Abstrackr Alternatives to ASReview The whole list