Side by side
AAArdvark vs Testaro
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
AAArdvark combines automated and human-led accessibility review with browser and CI/CD support. Its free option provides an entry point, while monthly plans scale site and page limits for larger portfolios.
Visit AAArdvark Free plan APILinuxMac+2
Testaro combines multiple accessibility and standards engines with flexible job execution and report formats. Its browser sandbox requirement and possible site blocking should be considered before deployment.
Visit TestaroThe facts
| AAArdvark | Testaro | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | See the plans | Not published |
| Plans published | 5 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | aaardvarkaccessibility.com | github.com |
| On accessibility testing software | #39 of 169 | #116 of 169 |
AAArdvark: what it does well
- Free plan available
- Checks against WCAG 2.2
- Automated scans and manual reviews
- Browser extension included
- CI/CD integration available
What to know first
- Paid plans billed monthly
- Higher coverage costs more
- Coverage varies by plan
Testaro: what it does well
- Free and MIT-licensed
- Combines many rule engines and built-in tests
- Native or standardized report formats
- Single-job and daemon execution modes
- Programmatic doJob integration
What to know first
- Requires Node.js 22.12 or later
- Hosts must permit sandboxed browsers
- Some sites can prevent automated testing
Alternatives to AAArdvark Alternatives to Testaro The whole list