WebSite Auditor

Overview

The software links site-level diagnostics with page-level optimization work. It can surface structural and technical issues, then add competitor and Google search context to help prioritize changes. That breadth suits practitioners who want an auditing tool that also supports content analysis; it is less compelling for users who need only a basic crawler or who require exportable client reports on a tight budget.

Key features

Crawling and site controls

WebSite Auditor analyzes site architecture and checks HTTP status codes, broken links, HTML errors, titles, meta descriptions, and link factors. JavaScript crawling and scheduled audits support ongoing review, while unlimited crawling is available on both paid plans. The free license audits up to 500 URLs, making it a reasonable small-site option but not a substitute for an uncapped recurring workflow.

It also generates Google-friendly XML sitemaps, can upload them by FTP and submit them to Google, Yahoo!, Bing, and Ask, and can create, manage, and upload robots.txt files through FTP. These tools make it useful for users who want sitemap and robots-file tasks alongside audits rather than in a separate workflow.

Content, competitors, and search data

Page-specific recommendations, keyword-density guidance, and HTML-element analysis give on-page work concrete areas to review. Comparing pages with 10 top-ranking competitors adds a reference point for on-page strategy, though it does not replace a broader competitor research process.

The software supports 750 search engines, including Google, Yahoo!, and Bing, and UTF-8 content in any language. Google Analytics data can identify the most visited pages and top landing pages; Google Search Console data can be brought into a project and exported for clicks, impressions, CTR, and average rank. Those integrations add performance context to technical checks, particularly for teams managing search work across pages and markets.

Pricing

The free plan costs 0.00 USD per free, for as long as you want. It includes 500 URLs and one project, but excludes paid report exports. That is enough for a small site or an initial evaluation, but the caps quickly restrict agencies or anyone managing multiple sites.

Professional costs 149.00 USD per year as a subscription fee. It removes crawl and saved-project limits and allows reports with watermarks. It suits practitioners who need unlimited audits and project storage but can work with watermarked reports; the lack of the Enterprise reporting functions is a meaningful drawback for client-facing or scheduled reporting.

Enterprise costs 359.00 USD per year as a subscription fee. It includes unlimited crawling and saved projects, plus PDF and HTML report saving, emailing, and scheduling, as well as CSV, SQL, and HTML export. This is the stronger fit for teams that distribute reports or need data exports; the higher annual fee is justified only if those reporting capabilities matter to the workflow.

A 7-day trial of paid SEO PowerSuite features is available when requested from support. Support can be contacted at [email protected].

Platforms

WebSite Auditor runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows. That cross-platform desktop availability is useful for mixed-OS teams, though it is not a browser-based service.

Who it's for

SEO professionals, digital marketing companies, website owners, and web developers are the clearest fit. It is particularly suitable for people who need technical crawling together with content recommendations, competitor comparisons, and Google Analytics or Search Console context. A small-site owner can start free; teams with recurring audits should weigh the URL and project caps against the paid plans, and those needing polished report delivery should consider Enterprise.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Technical crawling, on-page guidance, competitor comparisons, and search data are combined, reducing the need to switch among tools for those tasks.
• Pros: Sitemap generation and robots.txt management include FTP workflows, useful for users handling site controls as well as audits.
• Pros: Unlimited crawling and saved projects on paid tiers support larger or recurring workloads.
• Cons: The free edition stops at 500 URLs and one project, with no paid report exports, limiting its value for multi-site or client work.
• Cons: Professional reports carry watermarks, while saving, emailing, scheduling, and structured exports require the more expensive Enterprise plan.

Alternatives

Screaming Frog SEO Spider is worth considering when a 500-URL free crawl is sufficient or when unlimited URLs matter more than WebSite Auditor’s wider content and search-data workflow; its paid licence has unlimited URLs.

A1 Website Analyzer is another freemium option for macOS and Windows users, with a free mode that continues after its 30-day evaluation period and caps each website at 500 page URLs.

Netpeak Spider offers a free tier with 500 URLs, five threads, and use on two devices per user, making it an alternative for users whose needs fit those limits.

OxideSEO is a free open-source desktop app with no URL limits or subscription, a straightforward alternative for users prioritizing those terms.

TechSEO360 is an alternative with a fully functional 30-day trial followed by a free tier capped at 500 pages.

CrawlRaven is an alternative with a free plan for one website that includes Google Search Console insights and keyword and page performance.

Geolify is an alternative with a free plan limited to one brand, three audits per month, and five weekly prompt monitors.

SEO Crawler offers a free plan for one domain and 100 URLs per manual crawl, an option for users whose needs fit a smaller crawl limit.

Browse SEO Audit Software or SEO Crawler Software for more options.

Verdict

WebSite Auditor is a strong choice for SEO practitioners who want technical audits, on-page recommendations, competitor context, and Google search data in one desktop workflow. The free plan is useful for a small site, but serious recurring work needs a paid tier; choose Enterprise if report delivery and exports are central, or look elsewhere if you need a low-cost crawler without that broader feature set.