Side by side
MetaScreener vs Systematicly
Both stand on ai literature review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Visit MetaScreener Free plan Web
Choose Systematicly if you want an online workflow that spans research planning, review screening, analysis, and publication support. The free Explorer plan offers a way to begin, while paid one-time plans add answers, edit units, or literature review capacity. Researchers needing shared workspaces and institutional offerings must contact sales for pricing.
Visit SystematiclyThe facts
| MetaScreener | Systematicly | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Evidence Answer (one): $19, paid once |
| Plans published | None | 8 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | metascreener.net | systematicly.com |
| On ai literature review software | #33 of 38 | #26 of 38 |
MetaScreener: what it does well
Systematicly: what it does well
- Supports eight review types, including scoping and mixed-methods.
- Builds database searches from PICO, PECO, or SPIDER frameworks.
- PDF uploads can be processed for structured field extraction.
- Analysis includes meta-analysis, plots, sensitivity analysis, and GRADE.
- Imports references in multiple formats and offers varied export formats.
What to know first
- Explorer allows only 3 active personal drafts.
- Explorer includes one lifetime feasibility preview and three lifetime Evidence Answers.
- Paid literature review packs cap included studies at 15, 40, or 80.
- Team and institutional pricing requires contacting sales.
Alternatives to MetaScreener Alternatives to Systematicly The whole list
