Side by side
Litigious vs Practa
Both stand on legal practice management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
Litigious combines case management with document, billing, communications, medical records, and research modules. Its free, self-hosted model and ability to enable modules as needed make it most relevant to firms comfortable managing their own installation.
Visit Litigious Paid Web
Practa brings client and financial administration tools together in a web service, with Professional and Enterprise options. Its lack of a free plan and mobile apps are important considerations.
Visit PractaThe facts
| Litigious | Practa | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Professional: $49 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | litigious.online | practa.app |
| On legal practice management software | #9 of 141 | #102 of 141 |
Litigious: what it does well
- Free plan at no cost.
- Case management covers intake, status, timelines, and case types.
- Supports self-hosting and AGPL-3.0 source modification.
- Imports Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, and CSV exports.
- AI generation supports several providers and local Ollama.
What to know first
- AI generation requires the firm’s own API keys.
- Installations start with Core before adding modules.
- Self-hosting requires firms to use their own infrastructure.
Practa: what it does well
- Client intake and portal are included
- Document automation and time tracking
- Trust accounting is included
- Professional plan includes managed cloud hosting
- 30-day trial is listed
What to know first
- No free plan
- Professional costs $49 a month
- No mobile apps
Alternatives to Litigious Alternatives to Practa The whole list