FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Litigious vs OPREG Practice

Both stand on legal practice management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Litigious

Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb

Litigious combines case management with document, billing, communications, medical records, and research modules. Its free, self-hosted model and ability to enable modules as needed make it most relevant to firms comfortable managing their own installation.

Visit Litigious

OPREG Practice

Paid Web

OPREG Practice gathers core practice administration and client-facing tools in one web service. Its 30-day trial and user-based tiers help firms assess fit, but the absence of mobile apps and published prices may affect evaluation.

Visit OPREG Practice

The facts

LitigiousOPREG Practice
Free planYesNo
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Self-hosted, WebWeb
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published13
MakerNot publishedOPREG Practice
Websitelitigious.onlineopreg.co.za
On legal practice management software#9 of 141#131 of 141

Litigious: what it does well

  • Free plan at no cost.
  • Case management covers intake, status, timelines, and case types.
  • Supports self-hosting and AGPL-3.0 source modification.
  • Imports Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, and CSV exports.
  • AI generation supports several providers and local Ollama.

What to know first

  • AI generation requires the firm’s own API keys.
  • Installations start with Core before adding modules.
  • Self-hosting requires firms to use their own infrastructure.

OPREG Practice: what it does well

  • Includes client intake and a client portal
  • Tracks time and supports billing and payments
  • Provides trust accounting functionality
  • Offers a 30-day trial
  • Plans cover teams from 1–15 users

What to know first

  • No mobile apps are provided
  • There is no free plan

Alternatives to Litigious Alternatives to OPREG Practice The whole list