FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Eramba vs GRC-COCKPIT

Both stand on governance, risk and compliance software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Eramba

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

Eramba covers a broad set of GRC activities and supports both self-hosted and SaaS deployment. Organizations needing network scanning will need to sync asset information from a CMDB instead.

Visit Eramba

GRC-COCKPIT

Paid Web

GRC-COCKPIT offers tiered governance, risk, and compliance capabilities, from core assessments to information security and business continuity. The 30-day trial helps evaluation, while pricing requires a request and there is no free plan.

Visit GRC-COCKPIT

The facts

ErambaGRC-COCKPIT
Free planYesNo
Open sourceNoNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, WebWeb
Lowest paid planImplementation workshop: €800, paid onceFree or on request
Plans published83
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteeramba.orgsaviscon.de
On governance, risk and compliance software#3 of 43#40 of 43

Eramba: what it does well

  • Includes more than 70 importable compliance packages.
  • Supports LDAP, SAML, and Google OAuth authentication.
  • SaaS hosting includes daily backups and managed upgrades.
  • Community edition is free.

What to know first

  • It is not a network scanner.
  • Community plan lists no support.
  • Self-hosted deployments require manual upgrades and backups.

GRC-COCKPIT: what it does well

  • Supports policy and risk registers
  • Includes audit and evidence management
  • Covers many listed ISO frameworks
  • 30-day trial available
  • Professional adds whistleblowing and continuity

What to know first

  • No free plan
  • Pricing is available on request
  • Web platform only

Alternatives to Eramba Alternatives to GRC-COCKPIT The whole list