Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteSome links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
In late January 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Apple CEO Tim Cook each voiced concern about federal immigration-enforcement actions in Minnesota. But their remarks differed in force and audience: Amodei spoke publicly, while Altman and Cook addressed employees in internal messages later reported by news outlets. All three also used language that preserved room for engagement with President Donald Trump. None announced a company-wide break with the administration or a new restriction on government work.
What happened in Minnesota
The comments followed the January 24, 2026, killing of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis by federal immigration-enforcement personnel. The earlier killing of Renee Good also formed part of the backdrop to the growing response from technology workers and executives. Coverage sometimes uses “ICE” as shorthand for the wider enforcement effort, but ICE, Border Patrol and Customs and Border Protection are distinct agencies; the label should not be assumed to identify the personnel involved in every incident. Axios reported on the killings and the emerging tech-worker campaign.
The distinction matters because the debate was about both the conduct of federal personnel in Minnesota and the broader immigration crackdown. The executives did not all make the same accusation, and none issued a joint statement.
What each CEO said—and where
| CEO | Where the remarks appeared | What they said | What followed for the company |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dario Amodei, Anthropic | Public comments, including an NBC News interview and a post on X | He expressed concern about the violence, described the events as “the horror we’re seeing in Minnesota,” and connected them to the importance of democratic values. He also welcomed Trump’s reported consideration of an independent investigation. | He said Anthropic had no ICE contracts. That was not a claim that Anthropic had no federal relationships; reporting described the company as having a Defense Department relationship. |
| Sam Altman, OpenAI | An internal Slack message to employees, reported by The New York Times and Bloomberg | He wrote that “what’s happening with ICE is going too far,” while distinguishing that from deporting violent criminals. He also called Trump a “very strong leader” and said he hoped the president would unite the country. | The message did not announce a contract cancellation or a change in OpenAI policy. |
| Tim Cook, Apple | An internal employee memo, reported by Reuters and other outlets | Cook said he was “heartbroken” by events in Minneapolis and called for de-escalation and respect for human dignity. He also referred positively to a “good conversation” with Trump and the president’s openness to engagement. | The reported memo was not a public Apple statement or a policy announcement. |
TechCrunch’s January 28 comparison gathered the three accounts. For Altman’s internal message, The New York Times’ DealBook report provides the quoted wording. For Cook’s memo, see Reuters’ account.
#1 Best Overall
Why the Trump references drew attention
The remarks paired criticism of enforcement or violence with praise or openness toward Trump: Altman praised his leadership, Cook pointed to a constructive conversation, and Amodei welcomed the possibility of an independent investigation. These comments were not endorsements of the shootings or necessarily of the administration’s immigration policy. They were, however, more conciliatory than a direct demand that Trump end the crackdown or remove federal enforcement personnel from cities.
That mix can be read as limited dissent rather than a clean break. The companies operate in a political and commercial environment shaped by federal decisions on AI, infrastructure, defense and public-sector technology. Maintaining access to policymakers may be one reason executives choose measured language, but the available reporting does not establish their private motives. It is more accurate to describe the tension than to declare the comments cynical or coordinated.
Amodei’s position also illustrates why “no ICE contracts” is a narrow statement. It says something about direct contracting with one agency, not necessarily every federal relationship, possible indirect use of products, or the company’s broader role in government work. The reporting does not establish that Anthropic, Apple or OpenAI technology was used by ICE through a contractor, so such a claim should not be inferred.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →What employees and activists wanted
Technology workers organized through ICEout.tech called on executives to use their influence more forcefully. The campaign’s demands included calling the White House, seeking ICE’s departure from U.S. cities, canceling contracts with immigration enforcement and publicly condemning violence. Reports cited varying totals of signatories as the campaign grew, so “hundreds of workers” is more reliable than a timeless exact count.
That explains why the CEOs’ expressions of concern did not satisfy everyone. Activists were asking not only for words but for pressure on government and changes in corporate relationships. J.J. Colao, a signatory to the campaign letter, criticized Altman’s combination of condemnation and praise for Trump as an attempt to “have it both ways,” according to TechCrunch. That is an activist’s judgment, not an established description of Altman’s intent.
Cook faced a separate timing problem: he attended a White House screening of a documentary about Melania Trump shortly after Pretti’s death. Employees and activists criticized the appearance, making his subsequent internal note especially visible. His reported message expressed grief and urged de-escalation, but that should not be recast as Apple formally condemning ICE.
Rank #4
- Team of Rivals The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
What the statements did—and did not—mean
The headline’s “condemn” captures the broad direction of the executives’ concern, but it compresses three different kinds of speech. Amodei’s comments were public and explicitly connected the events to democratic values. Altman said ICE had gone too far in a message to employees. Cook’s reported language was more restrained: heartbreak, dignity and de-escalation. None of those is equivalent to a formal company position.
- There was no joint statement by the three CEOs.
- The cited remarks did not announce that any company had canceled an ICE contract.
- They did not amount to a documented corporate demand that ICE leave U.S. cities.
- Altman and Cook spoke internally; their messages became public through reporting.
- Amodei’s statement about Anthropic concerned ICE contracts specifically, not all government work.
The episode was therefore a moment of visible, cautious executive dissent amid employee pressure—not evidence that the three companies had severed ties with Trump or adopted a shared policy against federal immigration enforcement.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
