Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
In December 2022, artists filled ArtStation portfolios and prominent site pages with a red prohibition symbol over the letters “AI.” The campaign protested the use of artists’ work in AI training datasets without permission or payment, as well as the growing presence of generated images on a professional art platform. It made opposition visible and prompted a platform response—but it did not alter AI models that had already been trained.
What happened on ArtStation?
Artists posted anti-AI images and messages in their ArtStation portfolios, turning the platform’s trending and community areas into a conspicuous protest. The campaign also circulated on Twitter and other online communities. Participants objected both to AI-generated images appearing alongside human-made work and to the alleged collection of artists’ images for training generative systems.
Ars Technica reported more than 2,000 ArtStation search results for each of two related anti-AI phrases during the protest. Those were search-result counts at a particular moment, not a verified tally of unique artists or participants; many results could be variations or reposts of a shared design. Ars Technica’s December 2022 account documents the protest’s spread.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What did the anti-AI logo mean?
The widely shared design put the letters “AI” inside or behind a red prohibition circle and diagonal slash. Some versions added the phrase “NO TO AI GENERATED IMAGES.” It was a compact protest mark: easy to reproduce, recognize, and share, and a way for artists to signal solidarity without writing a separate explanation on every portfolio page.
#1 Best Overall
- ANTI AI STICKER: Set of three cool round cancel AI stickers. A red circle with a red bar through the word AI. Stop data centers and AI.
- SHOW YOUR FUN PERSONALITY: Imagine how great you will feel showing this message. Be memorable.
- AMERICAN QUALITY: Authentic Brian Bula sticker. Proudly made in USA by Professional Art Studio. Waterproof vinyl. UV fade resistant ink. Perfect sticker for your car, truck, SUV, RV, window, computer, laptop, golf cart, camping gear, lunchbox, tool box or any smooth surface.
- SIZE: 2.625 round - call it 2.5.
- QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: Suitable for outdoor use. Colors vibrant and long lasting. Waterproof vinyl. UV resistant ink to delay sunlight fading and discoloration. Apply smoothly without moisture getting underneath on smooth straight surface. Easy to apply. Remove as with any sticker. Does not peel, crack or bubble over time if applied correctly. Made in USA. No Chinese materials or equipment used. US seller.
The logo was not a certification, a legal ruling, or a technical anti-scraping standard. Placing it on an image did not automatically prevent a crawler from copying that image or require an AI company to respect the message.
Who started the symbol, and when?
Contemporary reporting widely attributes an early version of the logo and its accompanying protest language to Bulgarian artist Alexander Nanitchkov, who appears to have shared it on December 5, 2022. That is an attribution of an early, documented post—not conclusive proof that no similar symbol existed earlier. The protest grew in visibility over the following days.
The headline that brought wider attention to the campaign was published by Futurism on December 16, 2022. This was a historical online protest, not evidence of a current mass action. Futurism’s report captured the contemporary framing and protesters’ grievances.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Rank #2
- Full Anti-AI Manifesto Design: The outer ring proudly declares "SUPPORT HUMAN CREATIVITY" and "ANTI AI GENERATION" in bold arched typography, framing the iconic crossed-out "NO AI" center.
- Support Human Creativity Movement: Can be attached to laptops, notebooks, and water bottles. This sticker rallies behind the global community of artists, writers, and creators fighting to preserve the integrity of human-made art in an age of machine-generated content.
- Weatherproof Vinyl: Constructed from vinyl with a glossy UV-protective laminate. Engineered to survive outdoor exposure, car washes, direct sunlight, and daily handling while maintaining sharp colors and crisp lettering.
- Perfect 4x4 Inch Size: 4 x 4 inches with smooth, clean edges. Perfect for bumpers, laptops, studio gear, and anywhere you want your message seen.
- Strong Adhesive: Applies smoothly to any clean, flat surface with a powerful permanent adhesive.
Why were artists protesting?
The campaign brought together concerns that overlap but are not identical. Some are ethical or economic objections; others are questions about platform rules or copyright law.
- Consent and compensation: Protesters argued that publicly accessible artwork had been collected for training datasets without artists’ permission or payment, while companies could benefit from systems trained on that material.
- Imitation of individual artists: Artists objected to users prompting image generators to imitate identifiable living artists’ styles.
- Work and visibility: Some feared that abundant generated images would compete with commissions, reduce artists’ visibility, or weaken professional opportunities.
- Platform presentation: Artists questioned whether generated images should appear alongside human-made portfolios without clear labels or ways to filter them.
- Recognition of creative labor: Some saw systems trained on accumulated artistic output as benefiting from creators’ work while obscuring their contribution.
Protesters often described the alleged use of their work as “theft.” That language reflects their position; it is not a settled legal finding covering every dataset, company, image, or jurisdiction. The legality of training on particular copyrighted works depends on the facts and applicable law. The campaign made a demand for consent and control visible, but it did not resolve the legal dispute.
Was ArtStation itself accused of scraping the images?
The central complaint concerned images available across the public internet and their alleged inclusion in datasets used to train image generators. ArtStation became a focal point partly because prompts such as “trending on ArtStation” were associated with Stable Diffusion outputs, suggesting the platform’s aesthetic and hosted work were represented in training data. That association is not evidence that ArtStation itself created or authorized the scraping.
Rank #3
- Aesthetic Vinyl Stickers Pack: This set includes decorative vinyl stickers with cohesive designs and no duplicates. Each sticker features modern, pastel-inspired artwork designed for personal decoration and self-expression.
- Size: Each sticker measures approximately 3"x3", making it suitable for decorating laptops, water bottles, phone cases, planners, notebooks, luggage, and other personal items.
- Decorative Use Only: Designed for aesthetic decoration on smooth surfaces such as journals, scrapbooks, mirrors, helmets, skateboards, and office accessories. Intended for general decorative purposes.
- Waterproof & Durable Vinyl: Made from high-quality vinyl with vibrant printing. Waterproof, scratch-resistant, and fade-resistant with strong adhesive that applies cleanly and removes without residue.
- Customer Support Commitment: We stand behind our products. If you experience any issues with your order, our support team is available to assist.
Could the logos poison or change existing AI models?
No. Uploading protest images could not retroactively change a model that had already been trained. A released model does not automatically learn from each new image posted to ArtStation; the training data for earlier versions had already been collected and used.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
In principle, a later dataset could include protest images if someone collected and used them for training. That possibility is different from changing an existing model, and it would not make a red logo a reliable technical barrier. The campaign’s direct force was public visibility and pressure on a platform, not model corruption.
What did ArtStation change?
On December 16, 2022, ArtStation announced a NoAI tagging system. Artists could apply the tag to projects, and an account setting could apply it to current and future projects. When used, the feature added a “NoAI” HTML meta tag; ArtStation also updated its terms to prohibit companies from using NoAI-tagged content to train AI art generators.
Rank #4
- FUCK AI STICKER: How exciting it is for big corporations to fire people by using AI to compile information created by people. A few huge companies make trillions and the rest of us get a basic "minimum" wage to scrape by. Artificial Intelligence and the future sounds wonderful. AI sucks sticker. Technology is useful until it becomes too smart, cannot be controlled, and destroys the world. Anti AI.
- SHOW WHERE YOU STAND: Imagine how great you will feel showing this message. Trigger those who deserve to be triggered.
- AMERICAN QUALITY: Authentic Brian Bula sticker. Proudly made in USA by Professional Art Studio. Waterproof vinyl. UV fade resistant ink. Perfect sticker for your car, truck, SUV, window, computer, laptop, golf cart, camping gear, lunchbox, tool box or any smooth surface.
- SIZE: 3 x 9 inches.
- QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: Suitable for outdoor use. Colors vibrant and long lasting. Waterproof vinyl. UV resistant ink to delay sunlight fading and discoloration. Easy to use. Apply smoothly without moisture getting underneath on smooth straight surface. Remove without adhesive residue as with a typical sticker. Does not peel, crack or bubble over time if applied correctly. Made in USA. No Chinese materials or equipment used. US seller.
ArtStation explained that content without the tag was neither automatically permissioned nor automatically prohibited for AI training. The tag expressed an artist’s position and invoked a platform-level restriction, but it could not guarantee that every crawler would read or obey the signal, control copies elsewhere on the internet, or settle whether earlier use was lawful.
Where the account-level setting was located
- Open the profile menu and choose Settings.
- Go to Account, enable NoAI Tagging, and select Save.
ArtStation also offered project-level tagging when uploading or editing a project. These labels were controls within the platform’s system, not a universal opt-out register for every dataset or company. ArtStation’s NoAI announcement describes the feature and its terms.
Did ArtStation ban AI-generated artwork?
No. The response was not a blanket ban. ArtStation continued to permit AI-generated work while offering tagging and, in a later update, filters that let users hide AI artwork from some homepage galleries, search areas, and marketplace views. Those are filtering and control options, not a platform-wide prohibition. ArtStation’s January 2023 AI Filters update describes those options.
Best Value
- Aesthetic Vinyl Stickers Pack: This set includes decorative vinyl stickers with cohesive designs and no duplicates. Each sticker features modern, pastel-inspired artwork designed for personal decoration and self-expression.
- Size: Each sticker measures approximately 3"x3", making it suitable for decorating laptops, water bottles, phone cases, planners, notebooks, luggage, and other personal items.
- Decorative Use Only: Designed for aesthetic decoration on smooth surfaces such as journals, scrapbooks, mirrors, helmets, skateboards, and office accessories. Intended for general decorative purposes.
- Waterproof & Durable Vinyl: Made from high-quality vinyl with vibrant printing. Waterproof, scratch-resistant, and fade-resistant with strong adhesive that applies cleanly and removes without residue.
- Customer Support Commitment: We stand behind our products. If you experience any issues with your order, our support team is available to assist.
How did the Stable Diffusion opt-out proposal differ?
During the same period, Stability AI and artist-advocacy group Spawning announced a process for artists to request exclusion of images from consideration for a future Stable Diffusion release, then described as Stable Diffusion 3.0. The proposed route involved searching the LAION dataset through Have I Been Trained? and manually flagging matched images.
That process was narrower than a general promise to remove an artist’s work from AI systems. Contemporary reporting noted that an image had to be in LAION and discoverable through the search tool; large collections lacked a simple bulk opt-out; and the process did not clearly verify ownership. A request concerning future training would not undo copying or training that had already happened, nor remove information from models already trained. Ars Technica reported on the proposal and its limitations.
Why did opt-out remain controversial?
An opt-out approach asks creators to find their work and request exclusion; an opt-in approach would require affirmative permission before training. Artists and critics argued that opt-out shifts the burden to creators who may not know their images were collected, may have thousands of works online, or may struggle to establish ownership in a manual process.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallEven a successful request could apply only to a particular company, dataset, or future training run. Copies may already exist elsewhere, and different services may have different policies. As a result, an opt-out mechanism is not equivalent to consent, retroactive deletion, or a guaranteed way to remove a work’s influence from an existing model.
What the protest achieved—and what it could not
- It achieved visibility: A shared image turned dispersed objections into a recognizable public campaign on a major portfolio platform.
- It prompted a platform response: ArtStation added NoAI controls and later offered AI-art filters, without banning generated images outright.
- It did not retrain existing models: New uploads could not rewrite models already trained on earlier datasets.
- It did not settle copyright: A protest symbol or platform tag could express opposition, but neither resolved the legal status of training on particular works.
- It did not represent every artist: The campaign was highly visible, but it was not a census or a formal organization speaking for all artists or ArtStation users.
The logo’s significance was political and communicative rather than technical. It helped make a demand for consent, compensation, and control difficult for platforms and AI companies to ignore, while the limits of tagging and opt-out systems showed how far a visible protest signal was from an internet-wide safeguard.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
